The Harbinger


Citizen Kane-not

February 8th, 2006

Johncom’s new website — www.reporter.co.za — highlights the potential and limitations of the new craze for citizen journalism.

The site invites members of the public to play at being journalists by submitting reports, columns or photographs of news events to be edited and published on the site with the potential of earning a small fee.

Johncom paid little heed to the web for the first 10 years of this new medium, so it is a latecomer. Now it is jumping onto the broadband-wagon and offering not traditional journalism — the company’s great strength — but a trendy pop journalism.

Citizen reporting of this sort is taking off globally, fed by the ease with which one can now record and transmit words and images.

A glowing example is the Ohmynews site of South Korea, which has attracted up to 40 000 contributors and an audience of millions. This venture had two things going for it: it operated in a country where the government has promoted broadband access to the internet; and it caught and rode a political wave. Its major claim to fame is the role it played in the downfall of that country’s previous government and the scoop of hosting the first interview with the incoming president.

In SA, only 7% of the population uses the internet, and household broadband is still only for the rich. Have a look at the Johncom site and you will see a hotchpotch of suburban trivia, hardly the sort of news to set the country alight.

The chief spokesman of citizen media is Dan Gillmor, author of a book called We, the Media. Gillmor hailed the democratisation brought by the internet, where anyone could publish and no longer had to find their way past the gatekeepers who control the media.

Citizens armed with their cellphone cameras and laptops were bringing an end to earnest, professional journalists deciding what was important and interesting. Ordinary people could influence the news agenda, not just those who had the public relations machinery to do so. Traditional journalism would be superceded by a bottom-up, participatory exchange of views, more of a dialogue than a lecture.

Gillmor left his newspaper job to pioneer a citizen journalism project serving San Francisco, called Bayosphere. Just last week, Gillmor had to explain why Bayosphere had failed and announced that he was moving on.

He still believes in the cause — “Citizen journalism is booming around the world,� he writes — and is now running the Centre for Citizen Journalism.
The unmediated voice of ordinary people has proved invaluable at times. Some of the best early reports of the London bombs of last year, or the tsunami of December 2004, came from ordinary citizens putting up their eyewitness accounts and photographs. But it also allowed for a range of hoaxes and rumours, which spread like wildfire on the net. Citizen journalism proved to be a good supplement, rather than replacement, for the force of traditional journalism. More than ever, we need real professionals who know how to find, check and double-check the facts, how to fill out and give balance to reports, how to present them quickly and in an accessible way and — most of all — who are accountable.

Take a look at Johncom’s new site.

It promises a range of lively material, but on closer inspection the reports are half-baked, the sort you’d expect from beginner reporters who would be sent back by a news desk to plug the holes. The pictures have a charming amateurishness to them.

Think of the potential problems. How do you verify stories e-mailed into you? How do you prevent commercial interests from placing their public relations material? Or planting stories for fun or to harm their competition?

If citizen journalism is not just going to add to the media clutter, then it still needs to be edited.

There is a place for citizen journalism. Done well, it has a rawness and freshness missing from our media. “User-generated content adds to the strength of BBC content,� says the head of BBC’s News Interactive, Peter Clifton. As a complement to traditional journalism, he argues, it is here to stay.

Imagine if www.reporter.co.za began to carry material from those township residents we have seen recently with stones in their hands, protesting service nondelivery. Imagine if they used this medium to start telling us why they are doing it. Now that would be something.

* This column first appeared in Business Day on 1 February 2006

Entry Filed under: Anton Harber, Online

1 Comment Add your own

  • 1. David wesonga  |  November 14th, 2008 at 8:56 pm

    Trust me Anton, the future is digital, and very soon, instead of updating statuses on facebooks and myspaces, people will be updating their statuses on citizen journalism portals. People will also want to be an active part in the news being delivered, not just passive audiences, but question still is how best to execute citizen journalism!

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Anton Harber: Media

Anton Harber

Professor Anton Harber directs the Journalism and Media Studies Programme at Wits University. He is former editor of the Mail & Guardian.
Full bio

Among the main results from the World Association of Newspaper’s Newsroom Barometer (a survey of 700 editors and senior news execs in 120 countries) for this year:
- 86% believe integrated print and online newsrooms will become the norm, and 83% believe journalists will be expected to be able to produce content for all media within five years.
- Two-thirds believe some editorial functions will be outsourced, despite frequent newsroom opposition to the practice.
- A plurality - 44% - believe on-line will be the most common platform for reading news in the future, compared with 41% last year. Thirty-one cited print (down from 35% last year), 12% mobile and 7% e-paper. The rest were unsure.
- A majority of editors - 56%- believe news in the future will be free, up from 48% from last year’s survey. Only one-third believe the news will remain paid for, while 11% were unsure. - From Editors’ Weblog

There is a crisis in trust and communication between the British public and the mainstream media, a new report has concluded. The gulf between public expectations of news provision and the actual nature of articles, which oscillate between esoteric or irresponsible, leaves readers feeling confused and excluded.
The report, entitled ‘Public Trust In The News’ was conducted by researchers from Manchester and Leeds Universities and was published by the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. - From Editors Weblog

Reflections on Journalism in the Transition to Democracy - Ethics & International Affairs 18, no. 3 (2004).

Journalism in the Age of the Market
- Harold Wolpe Memorial Lecture, Centre for Civil Society, University of KZN, Aug 2002

The Untimely Death of SA’s Finest Daily - Sunday Times, May 2005

“Two Newspapers, Two Nations? The Media and the Xenophobic Violence” from Go Home or Die Here, edited by Shireen Hassim Tawana Kupe and Eric Worby (WUP, 2008)

Remarks at Goedgedacht Forum, October 2008

The rise of social network journalism - From The 2009 Flux Trend Review (Macmillan, 2008)

A recent piece by me on the Zapiro cartoon row which appeared in Comment is Free, a Guardian blog.

BIG BLOGGERS

Subscribe

Feeds