The Harbinger


The Ministry of Dithering and Delay

March 27th, 2007

Imagine you have been invited to pitch for a pay-TV licence. You put together a consortium and hire a team of experts and all of you work for many months to prepare an application.

Comes the deadline, you have burnt the midnight candle to get it done. It is a substantial technical document. Since the cost of entering the satellite market is billions of rands, you have spent a few million making your bid.

You have shown confidence in the new broadcasting system. You are prepared to invest billions in this market. You are feeling good. You know the regulator which issues licences is a little overburdened and slow, but it is worth the wait to get into this market, probably abut a year. There are lots of other applicants, but there is no spectrum shortage here, so you have a good chance of getting in. You see how much money Multichoice is making in this market, and you can’t wait to compete for a slice of the large pie.

Then the Minister summarily withdraws the invitation. Just like that. Sorry, she says, but I have had another idea.

That is what has happened with pay-TV last week. Communications Minister Ivy Matsepe-Casiburri, last week published her department’s plan for the migration to digital terrestrial broadcasting (the shift from our current analogue TV and radio signals to digital television for our standard free-to-air stations, which would raise picture quality and allow for many more channels). To avoid “undermining� this process, new pay-TV licensing should wait until the launch of digital terrestrial at the end of 2008, the plan suggested. Stakeholders were given two weeks to comment.

The industry is reeling from this shock. How can the Minister barge in at this late stage and interfere with Icasa’s licensing process? How can she treat with such contempt those who want to invest billions into our media industry? How can she delay further a licensing process which has already been on the regulator Icasa’s must-do list for some years?

The only parties to benefit are Multichoice and MNet who are given a further breathing space without competition. Their licensing will go ahead.

SABC is heaving a sigh of relief. It was not ready for satellite, and its focus is on the digital terrestrial roll-out anyway. It will be more concerned with the Minister’s proposal (another bolt from the blue) that they drop television license payment for those who move to their digital system, and they be limited to five TV stations (their current three and the two new planned regional African-language stations).

The other pay-TV applicants include Telkom (which has planned a R6-billion investment), SABC and eTV. Together, their investments and the existence of a host of new channels with plenty of local content would have been the biggest boost to the local industry for many years.

Lawyers working for the various bidders are adamant that the Minister’s threatened intervention would be illegal and unconstitutional. This may mean it will not go ahead. But it does mean that the Ministry and Department have, once again, brought havoc and delays to the industry.

There will be many protests. For Icasa it will be a critical test, as they will have to decide whether to allow the Minister to mess with their work and their independence. If they let this happen, one industry player told me, you might as well rename it the “Independent Communications Arm of the Ministry�.

Small things often tell you about the big things. In researching this story, I went to the Department website to contact their media liaison officer. I have left two messages on her phone in the last 24 hours and one at the switchboard and tried her cellphone half-a-dozen times. No luck.

So I went to the “Latest News� section of their website to see if I could download the necessary documents. Their latest news is dated November 2004.

This is the Department of Communication., which is meant to be leading the charge to bridge the digital divide. They tell us, by the way, that their deadline for digital terrestrial TV is November 2008, a mere 20 months away. By way of illustrating how unlikely this is, Britain set a 10-year plan for the same process – and they have just extended it by five years.
So if the Minister wants pay-TV to wait until this roll-out is finished, we are going to have to be very patient. My guess is that there is such a wild party going on at Multichoice and MNet that they have been able to forget about their painful loss of open time, which kicks in at the end of the month.

*This column first appeared in Business Day, Narch 28 2007

.

Entry Filed under: Anton Harber, Media regulation, TV

3 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Darren  |  March 27th, 2007 at 2:32 pm

    You’ve raised some excellent points, and I couldn’t agree more on the unbelievably inept way the Communications Minister has handled this. We’d all be so much better off if she were to be re-assigned or, better yet, dismissed.

    But I do want to point out something I think you got wrong. You claimed that Britain set a 10-year plan (to be extended by five years) for the same deadline that SA is bringing into place in November 2008. That’s not accurate: The November 2008 date is when digital terrestrial services are scheduled to commence, after which digital and analogue signals will be broadcast in tandem. As Britain has had digital terrestrial broadcasts since 1998, their 15-year plan refers to the tandem broadcasting period before the analogue signal is shut-off permanently. Our equivalant date is November 2011.

    So the November 2008 launch date isn’t unlikely at all. The cut-off date might be a bit optimistic, but as we’ve seen with Britain that can easily be extended if necessary.

  • 2. Anthony  |  March 27th, 2007 at 3:00 pm

    One surely has to question the agenda of the movers and shakers at DoC. Arthur Goldstuck’s comments from a few days ago resonate: “Government must be far more aggressive. Unless of course, its public agenda is not the real agenda.â€? (Itweb.co.za 23 Mar)

  • 3. Grigorf Stewart  |  April 2nd, 2007 at 2:52 pm

    Has anyone who wishes to get into the Pay TV market actually looked at what has happend over the past 15 years with competing pay tv platforms in other countries worldwide?

    They end up merging or dying as no market can really sustain two platforms and certainly not South Africa, a free to air channel yes but not a Pay TV channel.

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Anton Harber: Media

Anton Harber

Professor Anton Harber directs the Journalism and Media Studies Programme at Wits University. He is former editor of the Mail & Guardian.
Full bio

Daily newspaper sales, South Africa
(Ave sales Jul-Dec)
1960 - 681 053 (Population 17,3m)
1970 - 723 566 (22m)
1980 - 803 229 (27,5m)
1990 - 1 214 396 (35,2m)
2000 - 1 117 886 (44m)
2006 - 1 600 000 (47,3m)
2011 - 1 310 000 (49m)

(Sources: ABC and nationmaster.com)

“It was pure political theatre. The excited room was filled with government officials, government consultants, quasi-government agencies, politicians and pupils from government schools. As if on cue, the room rang with applause as one education victory after another was claimed. This was, after all, the annual drama in which the minister of basic education appears on stage to announce the Grade 12 National Senior Certificate (NSC) results …” - Educationist Jonathan Jansen, one of the few with the credibility to look critically at this “celebratory orgy of mediocrity”.

“The (Incwala) ceremony is cloaked in secrecy and marks the (Swaziland) king’s return to public life after a period of withdrawal and spiritual contemplation. Among its highlights is a symbolic demonstration by the king of his power and dominance in a process involving his penetration of a black bull … But last year’s selected bull, according to a recent account from a whistle-blowing Incwala initiate, objected strongly, and threw off Africa’s last absolute monarch.” - Some surprises in this (un-bylined) account of Swaziland politics in Southern African Report

“When the Great Zucchini arrived that Saturday morning, Don had no idea who he was. Frankly, he didn’t look like a great anything. He looked like a house painter, Don thought, with some justification. He wears no costume. He was in painter’s pants, a coffee-stained shirt and a two-day growth of beard. He toted his beat-up props in beat-up steamer trunks, with ripped faux leather and broken hinges hanging askew.” - A classic of magazine profiling, by Gene Weingarten of the Washington Post.

Diepsloot (Jonathan Ball, 2011)

Diesploot: Of Frogs and Fractals, a public lecture at the University of Johannesburg, 4 August 2011

Troublemakers - The Best of South Africa's Investigative JournalismTroublemakers - The Best of South Africa’s Investigative Journalism (Jacana, 2101), edited by Anton Harber and Margaret Renn

Introduction - The Troublemakers: An account of the rise of a new wave of investigative journalism in South Africa.


What is Left Unsaid: Reporting the South African HIV Epidemic, edited by Kristin Palitza, Natalie Ridgard, Helen Struthers and Anton Harber (Fanele, 2010)

Reflections on Journalism in the Transition to Democracy - Ethics & International Affairs 18, no. 3 (2004).

Journalism in the Age of the Market
- Harold Wolpe Memorial Lecture, Centre for Civil Society, University of KZN, Aug 2002

The Untimely Death of SA’s Finest Daily - Sunday Times, May 2005

“Two Newspapers, Two Nations? The Media and the Xenophobic Violence” from Go Home or Die Here, edited by Shireen Hassim Tawana Kupe and Eric Worby (WUP, 2008)

Remarks at Goedgedacht Forum, October 2008

The rise of social network journalism - From The 2009 Flux Trend Review (Macmillan, 2008)

BIG BLOGGERS

Subscribe

Feeds