<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Signs of the Times</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theharbinger.co.za/wordpress/2007/07/15/signs-of-the-times/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theharbinger.co.za/wordpress/2007/07/15/signs-of-the-times/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 15:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Average reader</title>
		<link>http://www.theharbinger.co.za/wordpress/2007/07/15/signs-of-the-times/#comment-53466</link>
		<dc:creator>Average reader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 12:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.big.co.za/wordpress/2007/07/15/signs-of-the-times/#comment-53466</guid>
		<description>Bravo Anton. I think you speak for so many who are too nervous to stand alone in their (what I agree is fair) criticism of The Times. 

The bigger you are, the harder you fall. And these guys sold the idea of The Times as a revolutionary new take on everything South African media had seen before. Unfortunately, it's not. 

I think though that time will help. But broken promises are not easily forgiven. Does this make me visit The Times more than IOL on a daily basis? No. Does it make the average Sunday Times subscriber visit their website more? I'm sure the answer is also no, at least for 70% of them anyway. 

Anyhow, good luck to them. They're trying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bravo Anton. I think you speak for so many who are too nervous to stand alone in their (what I agree is fair) criticism of The Times. </p>
<p>The bigger you are, the harder you fall. And these guys sold the idea of The Times as a revolutionary new take on everything South African media had seen before. Unfortunately, it&#8217;s not. </p>
<p>I think though that time will help. But broken promises are not easily forgiven. Does this make me visit The Times more than IOL on a daily basis? No. Does it make the average Sunday Times subscriber visit their website more? I&#8217;m sure the answer is also no, at least for 70% of them anyway. </p>
<p>Anyhow, good luck to them. They&#8217;re trying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

