The Harbinger


Battle of the Billionaires

April 17th, 2008

There is a billionaires’ battle going on in Ireland likely to have repercussions for our local media.

Tony O’Reilly is facing a serious challenge for control of Independent News and Media from another Irish billionaire, telecoms mogul Denis O’Brien. O’Reilly’s Independent group has interests in Ireland, England, Australia and South Africa, where they have dominated the regional English-language newspaper market for decades.

O’Brien, who has had a long-running personal rivalry with O’Reilly, has been buying up shares in the middle-sized global group since 2006. He has a sizeable 22,2% now and has in the past few weeks made his intentions clear.

The Observor newspaper reported this weekend that O’Brien planned to take control of the company and sell off the loss-making flagship, the Independent of London. According to “a source close to O’Brien”, he “isn’t intending to sit on the sidelines with his tanks on their lawn for ever and a day … the company won’t be in the same hands further down the lineâ€?.

O’Reilly and his fellow directors control just over 28%, enough, as James Robinson of the Observor put it, “to keep it out of the clutches of a buyer, but too small to run it like a family concern�, which is what he has been doing.

The South African interests are known as Sir Tony’s newspapers and they treat his personal opinions as national news. He has put his son Gavin O’Reilly in as chief operating officer and packed the board with his cronies.

But if O’Brien’s holding reaches 25%, which seems on track, it will be enough to disrupt the business and block any major transactions. If either of them goes up to 30%, they will have to make an offer to minorities.

O’Brien has reportedly been paying up to twice the listed price for shares and O’Reilly has in recent weeks spent some £14m to shore up his holding. Neither of the two tycoons lack the clout or the ego to pay over the odds for control of a company currently valued at £1,2bn.

The Independent board spoke out recently, calling O’Brien a “dissident shareholder�. O’Brien shot back, saying they were only trying to distract attention from the company’s poor stock performance.

One commentator points out that it would be hard to beat O’Reilly’s performance. Just last week, the company’s latest results beat expectations, with operating profits up 6% and margins up to an astounding 21,9%. Ad revenues were up 5,4% and online revenues 108%.

That is quite a performance in the current newspaper market (though the group is also in outdoor advertising and radio) and will not be an easy one to improve on.

Most controversial would be O’Brien’s plan to ditch the Independent of London, as it could well lead to the paper’s demise. It is the jewel in the group’s crown and O’Reilly has never flinched from supporting it, despite its losses.

He has said it is his “calling card�, the one that gets him access to the presidents he likes to hang around in countries where he is thinking of investing. His friendship with Nelson Mandela helped him pick up his newspapers here are at a bargain-basement price. They have become a major earner for him since then as energetic cost-cutting has allowed him to ship handsome profits back to Ireland (to the detriment, many say, of the quality of these papers). Certainly, O’Reilly has not been reinvesting much into the sector here.

And his 100% control of the South African group means that it is the least empowered media group in a sector drawing flak for its lack of black owners. While there is at least some movement in the shareholding of Avusa and Naspers, and Caxton is in the process of breaking away from Avusa, Independent has remained relatively immune to these pressures.

Various black business interests have often sniffed around Independent’s South African interests, but O’Reilly has never offered local investors more than an expensive minority position.

But one of the effects of the Irish battle has been to make newspaper people take a fresh look at O’Reilly, realising that for all his faults he probably cares a lot more for the industry than O’Brien.

Maybe the pressures will open up opportunities for change – and new investment – in our local Independent newspapers.

*This column first appeared in Busines Day, 2 April 2008

Entry Filed under: Anton Harber, Journalism, Print

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Anton Harber: Media

Anton Harber

Professor Anton Harber directs the Journalism and Media Studies Programme at Wits University. He is former editor of the Mail & Guardian.
Full bio

Department of Useless Information

Among the main results from the World Association of Newspaper’s Newsroom Barometer (a survey of 700 editors and senior news execs in 120 countries) for this year:
- 86% believe integrated print and online newsrooms will become the norm, and 83% believe journalists will be expected to be able to produce content for all media within five years.
- Two-thirds believe some editorial functions will be outsourced, despite frequent newsroom opposition to the practice.
- A plurality - 44% - believe on-line will be the most common platform for reading news in the future, compared with 41% last year. Thirty-one cited print (down from 35% last year), 12% mobile and 7% e-paper. The rest were unsure.
- A majority of editors - 56%- believe news in the future will be free, up from 48% from last year’s survey. Only one-third believe the news will remain paid for, while 11% were unsure. - From Editors’ Weblog

Worth Reading

There is a crisis in trust and communication between the British public and the mainstream media, a new report has concluded. The gulf between public expectations of news provision and the actual nature of articles, which oscillate between esoteric or irresponsible, leaves readers feeling confused and excluded.
The report, entitled ‘Public Trust In The News’ was conducted by researchers from Manchester and Leeds Universities and was published by the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. - From Editors Weblog

Other writings

Reflections on Journalism in the Transition to Democracy - Ethics & International Affairs 18, no. 3 (2004).

Journalism in the Age of the Market
- Harold Wolpe Memorial Lecture, Centre for Civil Society, University of KZN, Aug 2002

The Untimely Death of SA’s Finest Daily - Sunday Times, May 2005

“Two Newspapers, Two Nations? The Media and the Xenophobic Violence” from Go Home or Die Here, edited by Shireen Hassim Tawana Kupe and Eric Worby (WUP, 2008)

Remarks at Goedgedacht Forum, October 2008

The rise of social network journalism - From The 2009 Flux Trend Review (Macmillan, 2008)

A recent piece by me on the Zapiro cartoon row which appeared in Comment is Free, a Guardian blog.

BIG BLOGGERS

Subscribe

Feeds