The Harbinger


The SABC interim board

July 3rd, 2009

If we have learnt anything in the last two years in relation the SABC, it is that how you appoint the board is as important as who you appoint. The parliamentary committee which recommends candidates, it seems, has not taken on board this very basic lesson.

The new board needs credibility and standing, and they only have that if the appointments process is appropriately executed. Besides, if you are determined to appoint the best available candidates, and move beyond mere party-political considerations, then you would want to look carefully at all nominations and weight up the best combination of skills and experience to settle on a list.

It is worth remembering that last time around it was the parliamentary committee which messed it up by allowing Luthuli House to interfere in their decision-making. They changed their list after consultations with Luthuli House, even though they were unhappy with some of the candidates forced it by the political party. Controversy over those candidates plagued the new board from even before they entered office, and contributed to this week’s final demise of that sad board.

This week, the ANC-dominated committee started well by assuring everyone that they aimed for a consensus list with wide support. But the list they tabled came, I am told, from a meeting of the Tripartite Alliance two days before, via the ANC caucus. So the committee were unable to consider all the candidates placed before them by other parties, and unable to make their own decisions, let alone achieve consensus.

What happened was that they conceded one place on their list in a deal with the IFP but were not prepared to go any further, even though the other parties had put some interesting and worthwhile candidates on the table.

Actually, the interim board they appointed has its merits and has good people on it. There are some surprises, and the oddity of a political scientist and ex-journalist thrown in, but it also brings together a fair amount of skills and experience. I do not know all the members, but those I know are good appointments and those I do not have decent track records.

But it is a great sadness for them to be born in political dispute and conflict, with the parliamentary parties other than the ANC and IFP withdrawing their support for the list.

And it is a great sadness that the ANC has not seen fit to give the parliamentary committee the space to do its own work.

Entry Filed under: Anton Harber, Journalism, Media regulation, Radio, TV

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Anton Harber: Media

Anton Harber

Professor Anton Harber directs the Journalism and Media Studies Programme at Wits University. He is former editor of the Mail & Guardian.
Full bio

Department of Useless Information

Among the main results from the World Association of Newspaper’s Newsroom Barometer (a survey of 700 editors and senior news execs in 120 countries) for this year:
- 86% believe integrated print and online newsrooms will become the norm, and 83% believe journalists will be expected to be able to produce content for all media within five years.
- Two-thirds believe some editorial functions will be outsourced, despite frequent newsroom opposition to the practice.
- A plurality - 44% - believe on-line will be the most common platform for reading news in the future, compared with 41% last year. Thirty-one cited print (down from 35% last year), 12% mobile and 7% e-paper. The rest were unsure.
- A majority of editors - 56%- believe news in the future will be free, up from 48% from last year’s survey. Only one-third believe the news will remain paid for, while 11% were unsure. - From Editors’ Weblog

Worth Reading

There is a crisis in trust and communication between the British public and the mainstream media, a new report has concluded. The gulf between public expectations of news provision and the actual nature of articles, which oscillate between esoteric or irresponsible, leaves readers feeling confused and excluded.
The report, entitled ‘Public Trust In The News’ was conducted by researchers from Manchester and Leeds Universities and was published by the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. - From Editors Weblog

Other writings

Reflections on Journalism in the Transition to Democracy - Ethics & International Affairs 18, no. 3 (2004).

Journalism in the Age of the Market
- Harold Wolpe Memorial Lecture, Centre for Civil Society, University of KZN, Aug 2002

The Untimely Death of SA’s Finest Daily - Sunday Times, May 2005

“Two Newspapers, Two Nations? The Media and the Xenophobic Violence” from Go Home or Die Here, edited by Shireen Hassim Tawana Kupe and Eric Worby (WUP, 2008)

Remarks at Goedgedacht Forum, October 2008

The rise of social network journalism - From The 2009 Flux Trend Review (Macmillan, 2008)

A recent piece by me on the Zapiro cartoon row which appeared in Comment is Free, a Guardian blog.

BIG BLOGGERS

Subscribe

Feeds