The Harbinger


Independence for the Independent papers?

July 20th, 2009

The best news of the week is that Tony O’Reilly’s Independent News and Media may have to sell its South African assets, including its 14 newspaper titles. I can think of no South Africans that will lament ownership of these assets coming home - and the prospect of a new media owner emerging.

The global parent company of independent Newspapers is in trouble, losing money, unable to pay its debts and facing a looming deadline at the end of this week to do something about it. Some (like Moneyweb this morning) point to a declaration of bankruptcy, but I think that O’Reilly’s rival for control, Dennis O’Brien, will emerge to seize the assets.

Although O’Reilly at first reorganised, invested in and grew the South African company that he bought for a pittance form Anglo-American, for the last few years he has treated it like an extractive industry - pulling out every ounce of profit he could to subsidise his failing London newspapers. The South African operation has been cut to the bone and beyond, to the point where all the papers have suffered and some have become sad shadows of themselves. O’Reilly’s oversized ego has meant a reluctance to do the sensible thing, and close or sell its losing London operations.

Despite the massive profitability of his South African operation, O’Reilly’s local newspapers are mostly thinner than Michael Jackson in his last days. Most tragic is the flagship Sunday Independent, which has not even have a full-time editor for years, and is down to a staff of about two people. O’Reilly has wreaked havoc and destruction on South African journalism.

Independent’s South African newspapers are the most profitable in the global group, with margins of over 20%. They contributed Euro26-m to the international group’s profits last year, an increase of more than 30% over the previous year.

The question is who will buy the South African assets. There has been speculation that they could be broken up. I would doubt it, as the value of each individual newspaper is massively reduced outside of the strength of the group. The investment in outdoor advertising might be sold separately, but the newspapers really belong together. There has also been speculation that Avusa, Media24 or Caxton will step in - but I doubt that competition law will allow it.

That means it is wide open for a new black empowerment owner. Let’s hope so.

The purchase is not without difficulty. The price tag could be high, given the groups’ performance. But financiers are going to point to two major difficulties:

- Most of the Indepndent newspapers are highly dependent on classified advertising, and this if the first thing to move to the internet. The papers are therefore vulnerable to the imminent growth in local bandwidth.

- The printing presses are so old they need urgently to be replaced. The headquarters in Sauer Street, Central Johannesburg, are so run-down they look like something from an Afghan village recently visited by an American bomber. O’Reilly has made no recent investment in infrastructure.

The operation is going to need investment, so whoever wants in may face a high price tag as well as a rebuilding cost.

A likely scenario is that a buyer will junk the presses, and contract out the printing. Caxton is sitting pretty: as the player with major print capacity it is likely to benefit from whoever buys the operation by virtue of them needing a print contract.

There will be an outcry over a black buyer on the basis that it is likely to be someone with links to the ANC. Let me anticipate this by saying that almost any black buyer is likely to have links of some sort with the ANC. In fact, almost any buyer is going to have some political links somewhere. While we might prefer it to be held entirely independently by some entity with no political interest, one has to be realistic about it. What matters most is how the new owner treats the newspapers, and gives them space to do their journalistic work, not the party membership of that person or persons.

Let’s hold thumbs.

Entry Filed under: Anton Harber, Journalism, Print

2 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Does the Independent Empi&hellip  |  July 21st, 2009 at 11:14 am

    [...] the vagaries of the rand. Surely this in itself tells us the company is in big trouble? Anton Harber pointed out yesterday on his blog that the Independent have been putting off some massive capital expenditure in SA (in the form of [...]

  • 2. Chris  |  August 3rd, 2009 at 7:13 pm

    In your opinion what will be the reason for this outcome ” The South African operation has been cut to the bone and beyond,” . Great post by the way

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Anton Harber: Media

Anton Harber

Professor Anton Harber directs the Journalism and Media Studies Programme at Wits University. He is former editor of the Mail & Guardian.
Full bio

Among the main results from the World Association of Newspaper’s Newsroom Barometer (a survey of 700 editors and senior news execs in 120 countries) for this year:
- 86% believe integrated print and online newsrooms will become the norm, and 83% believe journalists will be expected to be able to produce content for all media within five years.
- Two-thirds believe some editorial functions will be outsourced, despite frequent newsroom opposition to the practice.
- A plurality - 44% - believe on-line will be the most common platform for reading news in the future, compared with 41% last year. Thirty-one cited print (down from 35% last year), 12% mobile and 7% e-paper. The rest were unsure.
- A majority of editors - 56%- believe news in the future will be free, up from 48% from last year’s survey. Only one-third believe the news will remain paid for, while 11% were unsure. - From Editors’ Weblog

There is a crisis in trust and communication between the British public and the mainstream media, a new report has concluded. The gulf between public expectations of news provision and the actual nature of articles, which oscillate between esoteric or irresponsible, leaves readers feeling confused and excluded.
The report, entitled ‘Public Trust In The News’ was conducted by researchers from Manchester and Leeds Universities and was published by the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. - From Editors Weblog

Reflections on Journalism in the Transition to Democracy - Ethics & International Affairs 18, no. 3 (2004).

Journalism in the Age of the Market
- Harold Wolpe Memorial Lecture, Centre for Civil Society, University of KZN, Aug 2002

The Untimely Death of SA’s Finest Daily - Sunday Times, May 2005

“Two Newspapers, Two Nations? The Media and the Xenophobic Violence” from Go Home or Die Here, edited by Shireen Hassim Tawana Kupe and Eric Worby (WUP, 2008)

Remarks at Goedgedacht Forum, October 2008

The rise of social network journalism - From The 2009 Flux Trend Review (Macmillan, 2008)

A recent piece by me on the Zapiro cartoon row which appeared in Comment is Free, a Guardian blog.

BIG BLOGGERS

Subscribe

Feeds