The Harbinger


New models of reporting

November 2nd, 2009

Here are two interesting new forms of “collaborative” reporting, based on entirely new internet funding models: www.spot.us and www.demandmedia.com

Spot.us is a non-profit based in California which makes use of “crowdfunding” or “community funding - asking the public to make contributions to enable freelancers to undertake investigative reporting. They pitch a story on their site and tell you how much they need to do it. You hit a button to make what can be a very modest donation and the site tells you how much more they need to raise to go after the story.

If they sell the story, you get refunded.

Essentially, it allow you to commission your own reporter and influence what they cover (not how they cover it). “It’s a marketplace where independent reporters, community members and news organizations can come together and collaborate,” according to their site.

It is the product of the Centre for Media Change in San Francisco. “Our mission is to make sure that journalism survives the death of so many of its institutions,” says founder David Cohn.

Their stories are very local. On today’s front page, they say they need just $75 more to investigative the quality of school food in Oaklands. The story pitch tells you the benefit of the story, the deliverables (1500 words, a few photos, a short audio and a “Take Action” sidebar), and the journalist’s credentials.

Update: now they say they are fully funded!

Also on the page is a pitch for coverage of Bay Area courts, which says they have raised $1 000 in matching foundation funds, and a report on the delays and over-runs in building the new Bay Bridge.

Potential problem: could companies throw in money for their rivals to be investigated, or politicians use it to throw mud at others?

Demandmedia.com is a commercial venture which claims to have raised $350-m to fund its idea. It describes itself as “the leader in distributed social media”.

The look at what search combinations are in demand and then generate articles around that. They get freelancers to produce it, paying them $15 to generate it quickly and $2.50 to run it past a copy editor, and then post it on YouTube. They are the single biggest copy producer for YouTube, where their “How to” videos have generated over a billion (yes, with a b!) viewings.

Their revenue comes from advertising alongside their material.

It is a fascinating model: using high technology to discern what people are looking for and give it to them quickly and cheaply.

Entry Filed under: Anton Harber, Journalism, Online

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Anton Harber: Media

Anton Harber

Professor Anton Harber directs the Journalism and Media Studies Programme at Wits University. He is former editor of the Mail & Guardian.
Full bio

Among the main results from the World Association of Newspaper’s Newsroom Barometer (a survey of 700 editors and senior news execs in 120 countries) for this year:
- 86% believe integrated print and online newsrooms will become the norm, and 83% believe journalists will be expected to be able to produce content for all media within five years.
- Two-thirds believe some editorial functions will be outsourced, despite frequent newsroom opposition to the practice.
- A plurality - 44% - believe on-line will be the most common platform for reading news in the future, compared with 41% last year. Thirty-one cited print (down from 35% last year), 12% mobile and 7% e-paper. The rest were unsure.
- A majority of editors - 56%- believe news in the future will be free, up from 48% from last year’s survey. Only one-third believe the news will remain paid for, while 11% were unsure. - From Editors’ Weblog

There is a crisis in trust and communication between the British public and the mainstream media, a new report has concluded. The gulf between public expectations of news provision and the actual nature of articles, which oscillate between esoteric or irresponsible, leaves readers feeling confused and excluded.
The report, entitled ‘Public Trust In The News’ was conducted by researchers from Manchester and Leeds Universities and was published by the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. - From Editors Weblog

Reflections on Journalism in the Transition to Democracy - Ethics & International Affairs 18, no. 3 (2004).

Journalism in the Age of the Market
- Harold Wolpe Memorial Lecture, Centre for Civil Society, University of KZN, Aug 2002

The Untimely Death of SA’s Finest Daily - Sunday Times, May 2005

“Two Newspapers, Two Nations? The Media and the Xenophobic Violence” from Go Home or Die Here, edited by Shireen Hassim Tawana Kupe and Eric Worby (WUP, 2008)

Remarks at Goedgedacht Forum, October 2008

The rise of social network journalism - From The 2009 Flux Trend Review (Macmillan, 2008)

A recent piece by me on the Zapiro cartoon row which appeared in Comment is Free, a Guardian blog.

BIG BLOGGERS

Subscribe

Feeds