The Harbinger


Media freedom starts in the newsroom

August 31st, 2011

Some of our editors seem determined to be their own worst enemies.

The Sowetan, still reeling from the ham-handed way it dealt with the Eric Miyeni controversy, published a front page on Monday which managed to lower the bar on bad taste even further. “Sies” was the headline above pictures of two on-duty law enforcement officers having sex. It was accompanied by a note in which the editors tried to say they felt obliged to splash this on their front page in the public interest.

The fact that the paper sold out within hours will strengthen the argument of those who say many of our editors are only concerned to maximize their sales, no matter how low they have to go to do it.
It drew the attention of the prurient Film and Publications Board, who said the paper had contravened the law. The last thing we need is to give our film censors an excuse to pay attention to newspapers, which is not and should not be their terrain.

There have been other recent examples of editorial short-sightedness which undermine the credibility of journalists and newspapers. The Sunday Times commissioned myself and three others to hold an inquiry in 2008 into a series of editorial problems at the paper and then tried to bury the report we produced. They failed to practice the transparency and accountability they were demanding of others with political and economic power.

Eventually, as is almost always the case, the report was leaked and this revisited the paper’s embarrassment. In the meanwhile, the Sunday Times had undermined the media’s argument for a culture of openness. It looked like they will not themselves keep to the standards they demand of.
This is not unrelated to the fact that the group of newspapers around the Sunday Times, all owned by Avusa, have now had three incidents of columns which got into print through negligence and which led to public outcries and summary dismissals of the columnists involved. One of the effects of this is likely to be heightened nervousness – and therefore blandness – among opinion writers.

The Star has also been taking careful aim at its feet. It has in recent months had to back off somewhat embarrassingly from a screaming front page report misquoting Julius Malema, as well as one suggesting the Public Protector was about to be arrested – both of which turned out to be based on shaky evidence.

Errors will always happen in the high-pressure world of journalism, more so at a time when speed is more important than ever. But you would think that when there are calls from the ruling party to take action against irresponsible, editors would be carefully weighting and assessing the risk they take.

Perhaps the most egregious example of podiatric pot-shots from journalists came this last weekend when almost all of the media ignored the Right 2 Know protest march to the Constitutional Court in Johannesburg.

The Right 2 Know works hard to bring citizens and civil society into the battle for media freedom, arguing that the government’s recent threats to free speech are an attack not just on the media and journalists, but on every citizens’ rights and powers. Deprive us of information, they are arguing, and you are disempowering citizens of their capacity to pursue and protect their rights.

You would think the media would welcome and trumpet such displays of solidarity. But, with a few notable exceptions, getting editors our of their offices to come and fight for their rights – or even just report on the fight - seems difficult.

Like cabinet ministers, senior editors can easily come to live in a bubble, oblivious to the fact that newspapers and journalists are not always liked or admired by the public on which they depend. My experience doing research in Diepsloot made it clear to me that people are skeptical and even hostile to the media because of the way it treats them – either not covering them and their interests at all, or doing it in a demeaning way.

Which all goes to show that the fight for media freedom really starts in the newsroom.

*This column first appeared in Business Day, 17 August 2011

Entry Filed under: Anton Harber, Journalism

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Anton Harber: Media

Anton Harber

Professor Anton Harber directs the Journalism and Media Studies Programme at Wits University. He is former editor of the Mail & Guardian.
Full bio

Daily newspaper sales, South Africa
(Ave sales Jul-Dec)
1960 - 681 053 (Population 17,3m)
1970 - 723 566 (22m)
1980 - 803 229 (27,5m)
1990 - 1 214 396 (35,2m)
2000 - 1 117 886 (44m)
2006 - 1 600 000 (47,3m)
2011 - 1 310 000 (49m)

(Sources: ABC and nationmaster.com)

“It was pure political theatre. The excited room was filled with government officials, government consultants, quasi-government agencies, politicians and pupils from government schools. As if on cue, the room rang with applause as one education victory after another was claimed. This was, after all, the annual drama in which the minister of basic education appears on stage to announce the Grade 12 National Senior Certificate (NSC) results …” - Educationist Jonathan Jansen, one of the few with the credibility to look critically at this “celebratory orgy of mediocrity”.

“The (Incwala) ceremony is cloaked in secrecy and marks the (Swaziland) king’s return to public life after a period of withdrawal and spiritual contemplation. Among its highlights is a symbolic demonstration by the king of his power and dominance in a process involving his penetration of a black bull … But last year’s selected bull, according to a recent account from a whistle-blowing Incwala initiate, objected strongly, and threw off Africa’s last absolute monarch.” - Some surprises in this (un-bylined) account of Swaziland politics in Southern African Report

“When the Great Zucchini arrived that Saturday morning, Don had no idea who he was. Frankly, he didn’t look like a great anything. He looked like a house painter, Don thought, with some justification. He wears no costume. He was in painter’s pants, a coffee-stained shirt and a two-day growth of beard. He toted his beat-up props in beat-up steamer trunks, with ripped faux leather and broken hinges hanging askew.” - A classic of magazine profiling, by Gene Weingarten of the Washington Post.

Diepsloot (Jonathan Ball, 2011)

Diesploot: Of Frogs and Fractals, a public lecture at the University of Johannesburg, 4 August 2011

Troublemakers - The Best of South Africa's Investigative JournalismTroublemakers - The Best of South Africa’s Investigative Journalism (Jacana, 2101), edited by Anton Harber and Margaret Renn

Introduction - The Troublemakers: An account of the rise of a new wave of investigative journalism in South Africa.


What is Left Unsaid: Reporting the South African HIV Epidemic, edited by Kristin Palitza, Natalie Ridgard, Helen Struthers and Anton Harber (Fanele, 2010)

Reflections on Journalism in the Transition to Democracy - Ethics & International Affairs 18, no. 3 (2004).

Journalism in the Age of the Market
- Harold Wolpe Memorial Lecture, Centre for Civil Society, University of KZN, Aug 2002

The Untimely Death of SA’s Finest Daily - Sunday Times, May 2005

“Two Newspapers, Two Nations? The Media and the Xenophobic Violence” from Go Home or Die Here, edited by Shireen Hassim Tawana Kupe and Eric Worby (WUP, 2008)

Remarks at Goedgedacht Forum, October 2008

The rise of social network journalism - From The 2009 Flux Trend Review (Macmillan, 2008)

BIG BLOGGERS

Subscribe

Feeds