<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theharbinger.co.za/wordpress/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theharbinger.co.za/wordpress</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 05:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>The future of journalism ethics: radical transparency</title>
		<link>http://www.theharbinger.co.za/wordpress/2012/01/31/the-future-of-journalism-ethics-radical-transparency/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theharbinger.co.za/wordpress/2012/01/31/the-future-of-journalism-ethics-radical-transparency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 05:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anton</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Anton Harber]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Media regulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theharbinger.co.za/wordpress/?p=876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Journalists in the traditional media dealt with their ethics through a set of established rules and practices.  We should not accept gifts or freebies, or allow a conflict of interest in stories we cover. We should be immunised from the influence of advertisers. We should separate commentary and news reporting and convey the views of all parties to a story. The watchwords were objectivity and fairness, and these values were reflected in codes of conduct and newsroom rituals.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theharbinger.co.za/wordpress/2012/01/31/the-future-of-journalism-ethics-radical-transparency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The dangers of bad science journalism</title>
		<link>http://www.theharbinger.co.za/wordpress/2012/01/28/the-dangers-of-bad-science-journalism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theharbinger.co.za/wordpress/2012/01/28/the-dangers-of-bad-science-journalism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 10:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anton</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Anton Harber]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theharbinger.co.za/wordpress/?p=863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a piece of what some might pass off as journalism in our newspaper today which is so infuriating that I cannot ignore it. It is a breathtaking exemplar of the dangers of bad science reporting. Under the strange headline “Scorched tree poser for cellphone giant”, the Saturday Star purports to take on the controversy over whether cellphone signals are causing damage to humans and the environment. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theharbinger.co.za/wordpress/2012/01/28/the-dangers-of-bad-science-journalism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

